Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 1:26:57 GMT -9
The Supreme Court has endorsed the regulations agreed between the Government and the and UGT unions for the preparation and registration of equality plans and recognizes the obligation of companies to negotiate equality plans with the most representative unions in the sector when they are not They have held union elections in their centers. As reported by in a statement, the ruling, announced this Tuesday, dismisses the contentious administrative appeal that CEOE had filed against Royal Decree 901/2020, of October 13, which regulates equality plans and their registration. . In those companies that do not have legal representation of workers because union elections have not been held, the decree attributes the legitimacy to negotiate the aforementioned plans to the most representative unions in the sector with legitimacy to negotiate the applicable collective agreement.
The employers challenged this attribution on the grounds that this legitimation was not provided for in the law and could not be established in the regulations. At the same time, it postulated that the negotiation, in these cases, be carried out by the so-called “ad hoc commissions”, appointed by workers without the democratic guarantees of the union election system. The Supreme Costa Rica WhatsApp Number Court affirms that equality plans must have the agreement of the company and the workers' representatives, a condition that “ad hoc” commissions do not have. Regarding those who hold the status of worker representatives in companies that have not held union elections, he affirms that these are the most representative unions in the sector because this is already provided for in the Workers' Statute and the Organic Law of Freedom of Association, therefore that the decree does nothing other than collect the legal provisions already established. Equal pay and equality plans The employers' association intended to prevent union participation in the centers with the argument that the information necessary to develop the plan could not be delivered to these representatives because it violated data protection regulations.
The ruling clarifies that the data “are necessary to carry out the diagnosis of the equality plan and that even disaggregated by sex, they are dissociated and do not contain, in principle, personal data that could identify the company's worker” and declares the legality of the delivery of the documentation to the most representative union organizations so that they, being legitimized to do so and forming part of the negotiating committee for the equality plans, can carry out a diagnosis of the situation and prepare the equality planand propose to the King the other members of the Government, but not the direction of foreign policy alone, as some and others claim. And not even that collegiate leadership is a supreme leadership since it is subject to ordinary and exceptional parliamentary control through the motion of confidence and the motion of censure, if the parliamentary groups consider that the legislative/executive discrepancy is relevant. Spanish shame in the Sahara Regarding the new Sahara policy, the discrepancy between Parliament and the Government is clear since the entire parliamentary group, except the PSOE, has expressed its opposition.
The employers challenged this attribution on the grounds that this legitimation was not provided for in the law and could not be established in the regulations. At the same time, it postulated that the negotiation, in these cases, be carried out by the so-called “ad hoc commissions”, appointed by workers without the democratic guarantees of the union election system. The Supreme Costa Rica WhatsApp Number Court affirms that equality plans must have the agreement of the company and the workers' representatives, a condition that “ad hoc” commissions do not have. Regarding those who hold the status of worker representatives in companies that have not held union elections, he affirms that these are the most representative unions in the sector because this is already provided for in the Workers' Statute and the Organic Law of Freedom of Association, therefore that the decree does nothing other than collect the legal provisions already established. Equal pay and equality plans The employers' association intended to prevent union participation in the centers with the argument that the information necessary to develop the plan could not be delivered to these representatives because it violated data protection regulations.
The ruling clarifies that the data “are necessary to carry out the diagnosis of the equality plan and that even disaggregated by sex, they are dissociated and do not contain, in principle, personal data that could identify the company's worker” and declares the legality of the delivery of the documentation to the most representative union organizations so that they, being legitimized to do so and forming part of the negotiating committee for the equality plans, can carry out a diagnosis of the situation and prepare the equality planand propose to the King the other members of the Government, but not the direction of foreign policy alone, as some and others claim. And not even that collegiate leadership is a supreme leadership since it is subject to ordinary and exceptional parliamentary control through the motion of confidence and the motion of censure, if the parliamentary groups consider that the legislative/executive discrepancy is relevant. Spanish shame in the Sahara Regarding the new Sahara policy, the discrepancy between Parliament and the Government is clear since the entire parliamentary group, except the PSOE, has expressed its opposition.